🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for playing the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. The movie, though, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized version promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a endorsement rather than a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and its pop-culture machine have collaborated to craft a tailor-made version of Putin. This figure is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a TV series released last fall, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “rescue” the nation from disorder. Although the character's name Mikhail, the message is clear: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in buttressing this same narrative rather than undercutting it. A new film based on a popular book sets out to undermine the Putin cult by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, the president is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to steady the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and all but beg him to take the top job. His response is that he would rather govern from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. Historically, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody ever begged him to take the job. The position was in essence a selection process with no shortage of contenders. Central to this process stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who planned to control the state de facto.

• The shortlist featured several politicians, among them an opposition leader later murdered and a former spy chief.
• Per a journalist who studied Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A property developer familiar with the events stated the primary requirement was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his “recruitment work” in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with actual agent work.

Interestingly, the move to framing him as a “spy” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s debut as James Bond. The grittier version prompted local outlets and social media to draw visual parallels with their leader. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on city centers, feeding the increasing trend to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the authorities are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of public dissent, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is often an all-powerful presence who remains unseen directly. His influence is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. In this new film, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the very myths it might seek to examine.